questions which might need to be reasarched

Currently I am looking at various Text Classification methods and later on will
be delving into the area of Information Extraction.

Now there are many classification algorithms which weight word/text in
various manners leading to different accuracy results.
Now my question is what are the possible parameters/dimensions of the
input text which wud in a non-statistical way give you the most
appropriate classification method to use.
So one wud know exactly which classification method wud serve him best
for his particular domain or problem.

symmetry

my first day at office after my long trek in Dhaula Dhar Range(HP).

yesterday I had hurt myself on my right palm and right kneee, superficial surface
wounds.
today while riding to office, I skidded over some mud and hurt my left palm
and left knee at exactly mirror-symmetrical positions.

donno wat to make of it.

no Part2

sorry ppl i wont be writing part-2: Lords of the Rocks! no will or motivation:(
I lost this thing that I can't explain. anyway lemme note down some thoughts that ve'been with me for some time, bfore I lose them too.

-> dreams - what do they mean, how do we interpret them, is it the link between the conscious and the unconscious, ...
->karma - do ppl actually get to work on what they love, which jobs in world from an objective lean angle are the most enjoyable, wat are the ingredients of satisfied work life, the concept of work as explained by Krishna in the Bhagavad-Gita -- shud that be blindly accepted, why work, does my work has meaning in life, in this world? ...
->transient - the non-permanent nature of human emotions, moods, thoughts, our very existence!
the role time plays in our lives, how time is an important characteristic of certain emotions, for eg joy is momentary while happiness is a more permanent from a temporal standpoint.
->spellbound - have ever had this feeling that you have something on ur mind, something very important but are unable to express it via ur thoughts/language/vocabulary.
Just like the finite cannot model or explain the infinite, is our linguistic framework insufficient to express all our mind waves, bcos after all everything we say, think or write, we do it through the medium of language. But surely we all had our moments when we were spellbound:), is there a way to extend this framework in a rational/scientific way, for eg one can actually approximate infinity mathematically by using limits;).

There are a couple of more trains of thoughts but I guess these are more than enough for the timebeing to elaborate on. I dont give myself a time-frame to write abt these, i guess i will just incrementally post my driftings:)